Women, Family & Work – To What Extent Are They Compatible?

October 30, 2009 at 12:06 pm | In Career, Children, Family, Future, Gender Issues | 1 Comment

 

In most societies today women compromise the large percentage of students at higher and further education establishments, with a great proportion eventually venturing into paid work.

Much of this drive to work and establish a career is down to many reasons, one of which includes having aspirations and being goal orientated, a longing to utilise the skills and experienced harnessed via exposure to the world and to incorporate the knowledge gained in their lives as well as in larger society to better communities.

Paid work and career differ from one another although the latter always comprises of the first, the first does not always necessarily include the latter. A career by definition conjures up an image of immense toiling, networking and investment of time (working overtime/unsocial hours), money (to maintain a particular appearance) and attention (the next event where you can flaunt your work credentials) in return for a healthy return in money and/or lifestyle.

Paid work in comparison may not involve frills of luxury but may simply compromise of the humble effort in providing a warm home, food on the table and clothes on their back. Women working full stop in certain cultures and/or families is frowned upon as it is indicative of their inability to provide for their womenfolk or the anxiety associated with their women being exposed to unsavoury people (I will write a detailed post on this soon)

But as a woman, how does the relationship between having a family and having a career work? Is there a balance? There was a recent article which made a correlation between unhealthy eating habits of children and working mothers, whereby children whose mothers work have generally worse eating habits compared to the diet and eating habits of children with stay-at-home mums. This shows similarity to research carried out in the 60s/70s by Bowlby who subliminally attributed lack of attachment to the mother and therefore affecting the child’s development and sense of safety, security, being able to engage in loving relationships down to mothers who went back to work shortly after the birth of their child. Despite superceding empirical studies emphasising the existence of a primary caregiver being important independent of gender, much is still made of Bowlby’s theory of attachment in inducing guilt and pointing the dreaded finger of blame.

Admittedly working or not working for women with young children/families should not involve the emotional upheaval it currently carries, much of this however is easier said than done. Not working for some women would mean giving up and saving up, especially if two wages coming into a family home were whittled down to one, with there being no significant increase to remotely buffer against such a change in living for even an iota of a moment with the one incoming pay packet.  This is currently the case at least for those living in London if one wishes to have a decent quality of life and live above the poverty line – a single income is insufficient unless you have your housing already paid for by the council and are in receipt of benefits or are ludicrously wealthy.

Alternatively narrative relating to mothers returning to work often focuses on the return being the 2nd option, with many automatically, intrinsically and of course naturally opting to stay at home with the child. This may not always be the case, so rather than looking at these women who want to return to work rather than stay at home (even if there are no pressing reasons for doing so) as the exception, we may need to re-adjust our lens and accept they are becoming the norm.

For mothers with young children who work, their support networks compromise of other mothers, creche facilities/childcare and most important of all their partners. Adjustments in family living are considered the norm with the addition of a new member but other facets of both family and personal lives often go untouched in fear of upsetting the mother/baby bonds “natural” equilibrium, despite there being nothing natural or healthy about being holed up with a baby all day, every day without any contact with other adults nevermind seeking out some respite from child care.

Much compatibility between women, family and work can be sought only after consideration of time, effort, management, bonding the effect (positive or negative), which support networks are to hand and what there is to gain by making such moves  -and as not all children, families and women are the same, nor can the decision to completely render family life and work incompatible as a blanket rule, applicable to all across the mothering board. They don’t say work and family is a balancing act for no reason.

Babydom

April 26, 2009 at 1:36 pm | In Children, Drama, Family, Learning, Life | 9 Comments

Having been around women who have newborns (that are not so new now, but roughly a few months to 1 year old) I have made a few observations. Some of them are follows.

New mothers have alot of criticism dressed up as well-meaning information/advice thrown at them (insidiously undermining at the best of times). Usually from older women, grandparents, in-laws and other intefering busybodies (usually in the female form). They advise you to wind/burp the baby after its feed by bouncing them up in the air. The spewing milk-vomit that’ll spray out will end up on you and are they going to clean it up? I didn’t think so.  Lie the baby on its stomach – it likes that, especially after a feed. And what if it falls asleep and smothers itself in that position? (is that possible? Thinking worse case scenario here).

They advise you to start feeding the baby cultural food, like mashed up indian lentils or buttered chappati’s broken up into small pieces when they’ve barely begun to associate food with swallowing. There is no order with regards to feeding time for the child nor does the child associate the table in the kitchen with dinner time because he/she is bounced from lap to lap and fed all kinds in between the main meals. Who feeds the child slices of cheese when they should be having dinner? Or fizzy drinks like Coke instead of water/fruit juice/milk?

Grandparents especially paternal one’s which depending on where you moved to after marriage will be the one’s who’ll have most contact with the baby for most of its years (until they or you move away elsewhere). For those who live with their inlaws, complaints of taking the baby away for the whole day and playing with it, whilst they lie in bed recovering from the C-section stitches.  Perhaps see how the mother of the child is doing since she probably needs attention and aid. It’s little wonder why some new mothers disappear off to their maternal home for a month or 2 after the birth of a baby. They wouldn’t get the same level of care anywhere else. I would like to think otherwise, but really I believe this to be true. Regardless of how well-meaning they may be.

Most of them worry when their baby doesn’t take to their breast for the ceremonious, often sore, painful (at first so i’ve been told) and laborious task of breastfeeding (bf). Some of them consider it slightly problematic should they be out and about – how to bf the baby in public? A woman using her breasts in this manner (for their very purpose and not just a plaything or something to ogle at) is repulsing and considered uncivil and inappropriate. After all she’s flashing her private bits in public. How terrible. Do people really believe women who bf have their bits out like the Playboy bunnies whilst doing so??

Infact why bf (if you can) when they can give formula milk. The baby will be nice and chubby. Everybody likes chubby babies – chubbiness is testimony of the love the mother has for the child (by feeding it of course -how else do you show people you love your baby?). Nevermind that the child wheezes when he/she barely runs a few steps, and breathes like an old man with a collapsible lung. Bottle feed they are told, its better. Ah but we all know breast is best, which however doesn’t always result into a fat, and therefore healthy, baby.

And as mothers are usually responsible for the health of their baby, keeping a close eye on their eating habits come’s into swift play. This is usually compounded by others who wish to feed the baby without even considering to ask the mother if it is ok for them to do so. There is some unexpressed shared “ownership” (for lack of a better descript) of the child, especially if you live with extended family or family pops around.  Sweet sugary snacks, fizzy drinks, cakes, crisps, chocolate are the favourite culprits. Is asking the mother if they can feed the baby xyz considered too “Western” a concept, mother is a control freak or perhaps demonstrates lack of trust?

This is just the beginning, wait until the child starts school or when the mother decides to go back to work!

Welcome to the world of babydom.

Celebrity Lives: Shariah Style

March 10, 2009 at 9:15 pm | In Children, Discursive, Family, Future, Gender Issues, Islam, Media, Men, Non-Muslim, Patriarchy, Society, Television, Women | 3 Comments

Ajmal looks at how shariah would deal with issues such as divorce, marriage and settlements and inheritance using the example of celebrities such as Paul McCartney & Heather Mills, Madonna and Guy Ritchie. Ajmal draws comparisons between British law and Shariah law.  Some of the comparisons being surprising, and some not so surprising.

You can view the programme at BBC iPlayer

Ajmal recognises civil disputes to be real issues, and for those who have been participating in my blog discussions on these topics such as divorce and inheritance up til date will know I wholly agree. I am glad Ajmal agree’s too.

Lost Generation

March 9, 2009 at 10:01 pm | In Career, Children, Culture, Family, Future, Learning, Life, Media, Society | 14 Comments

Came across this at Asma’s blog. It’s fantastic.

Children – A Uniting Force?

February 20, 2009 at 11:10 pm | In Children, Learning, Life, Society, Uncategorized | 17 Comments

How come when you have a child with you people are more cheerful and receiving?

Despite looking dreary and not cracking a smile otherwise, especially on  the Tube, when there is a child amongst your midst they will smile, wave and generally look lovely. Regardless of who they are, what they look like. They all have the same reaction. They look human - all touchy feely and you begin to believe they do indeed have a pulse and aren’t just 9-5 robots. Albeit this special treatment is primarily for the child, and he/she is at the receiving end of this attention but eventually they acknowledge the adult with the child and also give them a warm smile. A wee crack of a smile.

( They must believe this well-behaved child is such an angel. How cute does he/she look. Aww. Bless his/her cotton socks. Little do they know what he/she is like behind closed doors. Temperamental and naughty would be an understatement. )

I love it.

People should smile more often, with or without child as the binding agent.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.