About Women

November 11, 2009 at 3:24 pm | In Gender Issues, Learning, Life, Men, Women | 3 Comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I loved this comment posted at Sophister’s blog when he asked women what we know about ourselves! A snippet of it is below:

Women want to be understood. So a woman will attempt to comminucate with you and will start by saying what it is that she wants you to understand. If that doesnt work, she will atempt to demonstrate it to you. If that doesnt work, she will call your attention back to it, and demonstrate at the same time. When that doesnt work, she will wait for a better opportunity to demonstrate it to you, and demonstrate it to you then. When that doesnt work, she will become very irritated with you, and everything you say or do will annoy her. During this time, she is likely to lose a lot of respect for you, and that loss of respect will taint your every move and action until everything is a sign of your inability or ignoring of her wish to be understood. On the other hand, if you do manage to listen to her and understand her – she will increase in her love, respect and desire to please you.

Women also need to feel safe. That doesnt mean only safe from you, but safe from everything in this world that is a threat to her body, her mind or her sense of peace. If you support, or show support in anything that causes her to cry, to stress, to worry or to be unsafe in any of these things – she will see you as being against her instead of for her. She will therefore treat you like you are against her, and if you dont do anything to change this opinion, se will continue and increase in this feeling until it is sorted. But if you cant listen to her – it will not get sorted and she will continue on like this. If, on the other hand, you support her need for peace, support her need to feel loved, support her rights (most importantly the right to be heard), then she will increase in her love for you and protect you, fight for you and stand by you until the day she dies – even if you are wrong.

To read it in its entirety

Women, Family & Work – To What Extent Are They Compatible?

October 30, 2009 at 12:06 pm | In Career, Children, Family, Future, Gender Issues | 1 Comment

 

In most societies today women compromise the large percentage of students at higher and further education establishments, with a great proportion eventually venturing into paid work.

Much of this drive to work and establish a career is down to many reasons, one of which includes having aspirations and being goal orientated, a longing to utilise the skills and experienced harnessed via exposure to the world and to incorporate the knowledge gained in their lives as well as in larger society to better communities.

Paid work and career differ from one another although the latter always comprises of the first, the first does not always necessarily include the latter. A career by definition conjures up an image of immense toiling, networking and investment of time (working overtime/unsocial hours), money (to maintain a particular appearance) and attention (the next event where you can flaunt your work credentials) in return for a healthy return in money and/or lifestyle.

Paid work in comparison may not involve frills of luxury but may simply compromise of the humble effort in providing a warm home, food on the table and clothes on their back. Women working full stop in certain cultures and/or families is frowned upon as it is indicative of their inability to provide for their womenfolk or the anxiety associated with their women being exposed to unsavoury people (I will write a detailed post on this soon)

But as a woman, how does the relationship between having a family and having a career work? Is there a balance? There was a recent article which made a correlation between unhealthy eating habits of children and working mothers, whereby children whose mothers work have generally worse eating habits compared to the diet and eating habits of children with stay-at-home mums. This shows similarity to research carried out in the 60s/70s by Bowlby who subliminally attributed lack of attachment to the mother and therefore affecting the child’s development and sense of safety, security, being able to engage in loving relationships down to mothers who went back to work shortly after the birth of their child. Despite superceding empirical studies emphasising the existence of a primary caregiver being important independent of gender, much is still made of Bowlby’s theory of attachment in inducing guilt and pointing the dreaded finger of blame.

Admittedly working or not working for women with young children/families should not involve the emotional upheaval it currently carries, much of this however is easier said than done. Not working for some women would mean giving up and saving up, especially if two wages coming into a family home were whittled down to one, with there being no significant increase to remotely buffer against such a change in living for even an iota of a moment with the one incoming pay packet.  This is currently the case at least for those living in London if one wishes to have a decent quality of life and live above the poverty line – a single income is insufficient unless you have your housing already paid for by the council and are in receipt of benefits or are ludicrously wealthy.

Alternatively narrative relating to mothers returning to work often focuses on the return being the 2nd option, with many automatically, intrinsically and of course naturally opting to stay at home with the child. This may not always be the case, so rather than looking at these women who want to return to work rather than stay at home (even if there are no pressing reasons for doing so) as the exception, we may need to re-adjust our lens and accept they are becoming the norm.

For mothers with young children who work, their support networks compromise of other mothers, creche facilities/childcare and most important of all their partners. Adjustments in family living are considered the norm with the addition of a new member but other facets of both family and personal lives often go untouched in fear of upsetting the mother/baby bonds “natural” equilibrium, despite there being nothing natural or healthy about being holed up with a baby all day, every day without any contact with other adults nevermind seeking out some respite from child care.

Much compatibility between women, family and work can be sought only after consideration of time, effort, management, bonding the effect (positive or negative), which support networks are to hand and what there is to gain by making such moves  -and as not all children, families and women are the same, nor can the decision to completely render family life and work incompatible as a blanket rule, applicable to all across the mothering board. They don’t say work and family is a balancing act for no reason.

Kahani Tawaif Ki Zubani: Tale of a Courtesan (Heera Mandi)

August 14, 2009 at 11:25 pm | In Culture, Gender Issues, History, Learning, Life, Men, Muslims, Patriarchy, Society, Women | 2 Comments

Following from my previous post on the book DAncing Girls of Lahore is this documentary into the lives of prostitutes of Heera Mandi. The documentary goes through the various reasons behind this trade, their own stories, the lives of generations of tawaif’s who are born into the profession, the prized virgnity of young courtesans, the secrets and revelations made by sex workers themselves, their pimps (some whom are the male members of the family) and even the musicians which provide the medium for mujra entertainment.

This is part 1 of 6. The rest is available on youtube

Dancing Girls of Lahore by Louise Brown

August 12, 2009 at 10:09 pm | In Culture, Discursive, Gender Issues, Learning, Life, Literature, Men, Muslims, Patriarchy, Research, Society, Women | 4 Comments

Dancing Girls of Lahore by Louise Brown

This semi academic book documents the lives of women of Lahore’s notorious Heera Mandi - a colony infamous for its brothels and adult entertainment, spanning across centuries.

Louise spends around 5 years in Heera Mandi – spanning the various seasons of the year and followed one family over this period of time. Maha, a daughter of a prostitute and being in the business herself and her children, 4 girls and a boy portray a tiny glimmer of life in the brothel colony where relationships and love are framed in the context of sex and money and ultimately the powerful control these facets exert on the lives of the women.

I found the encompassing manner of including the many faces, personalities and dynamics which exist in Heera Mandi to be meticulously detailed. Glimpsing into the lives of the staggering and often stoned heroin addicts, the pimps openly conducting business transactions, in the streets, kusray, their communities, circumstances and the bittersweet relationships they have with one another, themselves and larger society to various Heera Mandi prostitutes – the old tawaifs from the era of the British Raj and nawab sahibs, to those girls fleeing destitution and poverty in villages, towns and cities in the hope of re-hashing a life rather than a mere existence provided Heera Mandi – the “Diamond Market”- a portrayal which reflected the many layers in which a society as fragmented as this was in many ways also cohesive. It’s people and the social norms and rules which regulate their existence being at odds with the larger convservative society, respect, honour and family being the cornerstone of a decent life, in loggerheads with an identity heavily loaded with stigma and a forever permeating presence of Heera Mandi in the lives of those tainted by it – regardless of how far they flee, and how long the exile lasts. Once a prostitute, always a prostitute – especially if you’re from Heera Mandi

The striking contrast played against the backdrop of a conservative Pakistani society – which almost ironically mirrors the location of Heera Mandi within Lahore nestled between the infamous Badshai Masjid, Roshnai Gate and Hazur Baagh is discreetly described through the relative secrecy in which the workers at Heera Mandi operate.

From wealthly clients such as Sheikhs from the Gulf, to politicians, members of the cabinet and entrepeneurs it takes little to realise the very sustenance of the women in Heera Mandi is dependent on the rich and affluent who can afford to purchase sex from quality women with the power dynamics often being skewed in favour of them.

However, there is much bartering and emphasise on the quality of goods – such as the age of the girl (the younger the better), her beauty (skin colour, features, attractive assets), her reputation (good dancer and sex worker) with the sale of a virgin girl being much prized, the relative desperation in terms of poverty of the family and the extent to which thise could be exploitated  -these all form a part in the agreed fee for their services, be it sexual or entertainment (mujra ) in the form of dance. Many clients may come and go, but the girls live in the hope of snaring a wealthy client who’s interest remains sustained enough to lead the girl and her family a comfortable life.

At what cost to their own chances of leading a life away from the brothels, to have a relationship based on love and affection as opposed to sex and financial gain is an underlying theme throughout the part academic/part biographical accounts of the women of Heera Mandi.

I’d recommend this great read. Another more detailed review can be found here.

Germany and EU to legalise paedophilia?

June 28, 2009 at 3:08 pm | In Gender Issues, Society | 10 Comments

BERLIN, July 30, 2007(LifeSiteNews.com) – Booklets from a subsidiary of the German government’s Ministry for Family Affairs encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age. Two 40-page booklets entitled “Love, Body and Playing Doctor” by the German Federal Health Education Center

“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex,” reads the booklet regarding 1-3 year olds.  The authors rationalize, “The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.”

Canadian author and public speaker Michael O’Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the West spoke to LifeSiteNews.com about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, “State-encouraged incest, which in most civilized societies is a crime.” The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of the Judeo-Christian moral order.

“The imposed social revolution that has swept the western world is moving to a new stage as it works out the logical consequences of its view of man’s value,” said O’Brien. “It is merely obeying its strictly materialist philosophy of man. If man is no more than a creature created for pleasure or power. If he is no more than a cell in the social organism, then no moral standards, no psychological truths, no spiritual truths can refute the ‘will to power’ and the ‘will to pleasure’.”

Read the rest here

If this is supposed to be an attempt to encourage children not to be ashamed by parts of the body (as private parts of children may be taught by some parents to be dirty which can lead to development of intimacy problems and issues with the body later in life) then it is going in the wrong direction. “Exploration” of this sort, spurred on by parental involvement is a dangerous ground to be treading.

What do you make of this article?

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.