Trip Down TV Memory Lane: Father Ted

February 1, 2010 at 10:14 pm | In Television | 1 Comment

We used to love watching Father Ted. Im not sure if it was because of Father Jack’s incessant cursing and outburts of “Bastard!” or “Feck!” which used to amuse me (although his appearance and general level of hygiene was incredibly repulsive – vomit on clothes, decayed teeth, saliva dribbling down chin: you get the picture). Father Ted, Father Dougal and Mrs Doyle all lived in the Irish town of Craggy Hill – in the middle of nowhere. But they seemingly always had something going wrong despite having little contact with the outside world!

My favourite episodes of Father Ted are those which include the Dancing Priest, and another where they end up in the ladies lingerie section of a department store.

Scary Movies & Children

January 9, 2010 at 7:32 pm | In Children, Media, Movies, Tarbiyyah | 16 Comments

When we were younger, much much younger than the required viewing age, we watched lots of horror movies. My personal favourite was Child’s Play, although I do recall being scared of my dolls which resembled Chuckie for a little while.

Do you let your children watch scary movies, or do you think its damaging to do so?

Desi Expectations of Females: From Childhood to Adulthood

January 3, 2010 at 2:18 pm | In Children, Culture, Family, Friends, Gender Issues, Life, Men, Patriarchy, Rants, Society, Tarbiyyah, Women | 17 Comments

As with all societies, how  boys and girls are treated is subject to social norms, expectations and behaviours deemed suitable according to their gender.

Amongst desi’s these manifest themselves quite strikingly when seeing how little boys and girls are treated by their adults. Tantrums, keen on playing in dirt, playing with their food, being messy eaters are all common across the spectrum, but what is interesting is the KIND of banter desi people, usually Indian and Pakistani have with their wee ones.

Boys (and I am talking about toddlers) are often asked if they like a girl at nursery/school – and usually they might play with the opposite sex but kids are kids and there is no attraction of a sexual nature involved in this. However, this doesn’t deter some adults from making comment such as asking them if they want to marry “shaadi karo ghay?“, if they like this girl, do they want to bring this girl home and who they want to marry (to which the boy promptly may reply the girl he plays with only because he has gauged the reaction of the adults beforehand towards this play mate of his).If a boy prances about naked, it is a lighthearted affair – remarks of “shame shame!” said half-heartedly laced in humour.

Girls on the other hand, amongst desi’s, are rarely subjected to these kind of taunts – if she is seen running about naked in her house, she is severely rebuked and is considered incredibly shameful “bey-hayah, bey sharam larki“. No-one should see “it”. “It” doesnt have a name that isn’t considered insulting or derogatory, unlike boys bits which have names considered “cute”. Regarding the opposite sex, her boy play mate may be known but jokes about whether she wants to marry him, and if she likes him are never asked. Never is she asked if she wants to become a bride, for this is inherently tied to her “leaving her maternal home”. Often girls may be told their parental home isn’t their “real” home, they are temporary dwellers “do pal ki mehmaan“,  and they infact aren’t really her parents for her inlaws are since her final abode is the home of their husband/inlaws.  The girl is being “kept” in her parents home to be “handed over” post marriage. Much like the way courier services may hold a package until it time for shipment to be dutifully handed over in one piece, unsoiled and undamaged! It is considered inappropriate and somewhat shameful to “encourage” these kind of behaviours in a girl, but with a boy it is deemed amusing and a source of entertainment hearing him say he wants to marry his female play mate.

These initial differences become very apparent as boys and girls grow up. Academically boys and girls are often encouraged to do well due to the competitive nature between families and friends. Parents take pride in relating the grades their children have got in school. However if boys dont do as well as their girls alot of effort is put in an attempt to sort this. If by chance a girl doesnt do as well as the boys in a family, it may not be seen as a big issue – after all “she is going to get married and have kids, not as if she’s going to work, so education isnt going to be of much use to her”. Of course if academically she does do well, it is seen as an achievement and much celebrated as it, as also with their boys, make them much more appealing in the marriage market if anything else. Down side to having a girl/daughter who is too educated? If you educate your girls “too much” it may make them less appealing as she would be 1) Too old (even if she is only in her mid 20s) and so will only find suitors who are divorcees (with or without children), widowers or much older men, 2) too opinionated, and 3) focused on having/wanting a career rather than being a home maker.

Boys are often to be waited upon, cleaned up after and not burdened with house chores.  Girls become mummy’s little helpers, engage in domestic affairs, take on large chunks of the household chores. Some go to the extreme of picking up their brothers’ dirty dishes after they’ve done with them and bring them water or whatever else they ask for since of course tending to their brothers is considered noble and a form of kidmat (service) for which they will be rewarded, but much more important than that is the practise they obtain for when they become married as it is predicted and secretly hoped they would pretty much be doing the same as a married woman. Girls regardless of how educated they may be, how successful their careers, good dress and lifestyle, well being and health are, are not considered to be “proper” women amongst the South Asian communities until they are able to run a home, which involved knowing how to cook and clean and be impeccable hosts, and churn out a few children. They are cultural retards if they cannot cook the cultural dishes adequately and are not swift in household chores.

At the end of the day, girls primary role and interest revolves around being good home makers, wives and mothers  – and so are raised with view of maintaining certain behaviours, traits and skills necessary to ensure they can execute this role adequately. Everythingelse such as a good job, or other ambitions are  secondary and not relevant.

In some ways, it seems like despite years or even decades of cultural reforms won’t completely remove how desi’s view their boys and girls – its too ingrained in their psyche

When Death Parts

December 18, 2009 at 9:23 pm | In Life, Men, Women | Leave a Comment

Channel 4 The Family: Stereotypes & Realities – Disownment

December 17, 2009 at 10:49 am | In Documetary, Drama, Family, Gender Issues, Life, Men, Muslims, Non-Muslim, Patriarchy, Society | 9 Comments

 

Channel 4’s “The Family” this season are following a Sikh family compromising of parents (Sarbjit & Arvinder), 2 adult sons, Tindy and Sunny (who is married to) Shay (the daugher in law), daughter, Kaki, and son in law, Jeet & toddler Bhavi all living under one roof (the latter couple temporarily living there as Kaki is heavily pregnant with their second child).

Many traits inherent in this Asian family seem familiar and wouldnt necessarily be out of place in the average asian family from the Indian subcontinent, be they Sikh, Hindu or Muslim. These are similarities which span across the spectrum, irrespective of religious leanings. A classic example being father Arvind who is oblivious to the dynamics of the kitchen and often beckons his wife without actually using her name. Instead he chooses to yell  “where’s my tea!” “I want food” or “you eat like a pig” when he wants her attention. Sarbjit lovingly retorts back, when she isnt half dozing away infront of the TV or grunting at Arvinder’s requests. The boys, aside from son-in-law Jeet, are rarely seen to venture into the kitchen either.

But aside from these stereotypes, the family addresses some issues which are pertinent amongst the Asian society, bringing them to the forefront. Shay, their resident daughter in law, has been estranged from her mother who disowned her for wanting to marry Sunny – he was considered unsuitable due to caste differences. This is being outcast/disowned.

Intolerance in marriage amongst the Asian community stems from issues such as compatibility, status, reputation and progressive gain. Many marriages are viewed from the lens of maintaining and preserving certain traits which are inherent and apparent within various castes and/or tribes. Some of this caste system has sprung from ancestrial occupations, with labourers, farmers seen as low due to being manual workers, engaging in menial tasks in comparison to landlords and intellectuals who were viewed to be loftier, desirable and often idealised.

Some caste differences are upon the insistence of having certain traits or family values which are upheld. Many of those who have caste marriages will admit it would be “easier” to fit in as they would “be similar” to “my own family”.

Preservation of caste is taken seriously and in some families is vehemently adhered to. There is family acceptance of anyone not towing the line would be outcase and disowned – which is what Jeet admitted he would do in a heartbeat should his daughter ever go against his wishes in the way Shay had done; nothing is above the family’s code and standards by which its members live according to.

A number of things which can lead to being disowned aside (and including) marrying outwith your caste/tribe are: marrying someone of another race and/or religious background, not agreeing to wed the person you were betrothed to since just after birth, pregnant out of wedlock or even choosing your own spouse. Although girls are systematically subjected moreso to these “rules”, the boys are not immune (although this is debatable as a family’s honour is usually tied to the behaviour of their women so this noose around their neck is often tighter)

Although the “decision” to disown a child is often took to be unanimous, it is often decided and acted upon by the patriarch of the home – this could be the father, uncle or brother (older or younger). Very rarely are mother’s so instinctively willing to disown their child, but as patriarchial family structures go – Asian families are very much organised under this male authoritarian rule. After which the outcasted individual is treated as being dead, but often the dead are (sometimes) remembered and spoken of fondly, the disowned cease to exist  – almost as if they had never been born.

Some of these ways of thinking are phasing out amongst the new generation however there is little doubt of it disappearing completely whilst the notions of “preserving”  ideals of caste, tribe and race  exist.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.